science:

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. Here’s what Erwin Schrödinger actually wrote in 1935, translated from the German:

That it is in fact not impossible to express the degree and kind of blurring of all variables in one perfectly clear concept follows at once from the fact that Q.M. as a matter of fact has and uses such an instrument, the so-called wave function or psi-function, also called system vector. Much more is to be said about it further on. That it is an abstract, unintuitive mathematical construct is a scruple that almost always surfaces against new aids to thought and that carries no great message. At all events it is an imagined entity that images the blurring of all variables at every moment just as clearly and faithfully as does the classical model its sharp numerical values. Its equation of motion too, the law of its time variation, so long as the system is left undisturbed, lags not one iota, in clarity and determinacy, behind the equations of motion of the classical model. So the latter could be straight-forwardly replaced by the psi-function, so long as the blurring is confined to atomic scale, not open to direct control. In fact the function has provided quite intuitive and convenient ideas, for instance the “cloud of negative electricity” around the nucleus, etc. But serious misgivings arise if one notices that the uncertainty affects macroscopically tangible and visible things, for which the term “blurring” seems simply wrong. (…)

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.

It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a “blurred model” for representing reality. In itself it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

  09:08 pm, reblogged  by mpalacio 270
Notes
  1. hardcorerunningthroughmyveins reblogged this from science
  2. thatonesuperqueerguy reblogged this from royybot
  3. royybot reblogged this from science
  4. anti-productive-day reblogged this from thelikelyculprit
  5. thelikelyculprit reblogged this from science
  6. sleepthenworkthenworkthensleep reblogged this from science
  7. tenchikeyes127 reblogged this from science
  8. thevilley reblogged this from science
  9. backpocketperception reblogged this from science
  10. kravolius reblogged this from science
  11. vociferousvic reblogged this from lesliewinkleftw-deathtosheldumb
  12. lesliewinkleftw-deathtosheldumb reblogged this from science
  13. usakeh reblogged this from science and added:
    THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.
  14. riteherebyurside reblogged this from science
  15. symmetry-of-origin reblogged this from science
  16. iatethetardis reblogged this from orodrim
  17. micaelamaynot reblogged this from saladsandwich
  18. orodrim reblogged this from saladsandwich
  19. saladsandwich reblogged this from science
  20. delta-velorum reblogged this from science
  21. courtkneejo reblogged this from theveganshay
  22. makingsurethatmerrygoesround reblogged this from science
  23. nickmcflurry reblogged this from science
  24. tatrtotz reblogged this from science
  25. fingscientist reblogged this from science
  26. bleedingedgebastard reblogged this from science
  27. futuredaniel reblogged this from science
  28. metaphysicist reblogged this from iamlittlei
  29. selfawarenesssuperpower reblogged this from science